Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'OMB PEG Directive Closure': Due to citywide budget cuts, CCRB is no longer able to fully investigate certain cases within its jurisdiction and suspended investigating some types of complaints.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2023-29092
Closed: 11/21/2023
Case Details:
-
Wrongful threat of force.
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Case: 2021-23203
Closed: 11/16/2021
Case Details:
-
Guilty:
Conduct prejudicial.
-
Guilty:
Discourtesy.
-
Guilty:
Failed to comply with order.
-
Guilty:
Improper uniform.
Penalty: Suspended w/o pay (10 days), vacation days (30 days)
Named in 2 known lawsuits.
Villafana, Shamarlon vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV07446,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 29, 2024
Complaint
Description: On March 3, 2022, plaintiff received a telephone call from defendant NYPD Officers Daniel Davidoff, Joshua Crowley, Dana Martillo, Titus Parham, and other John Doe officers instructing her to turn herself in or to be arrested. Defendants were acting based on a report filed by plaintiff's ex-boyfriend who complained of a verbal dispute. Plaintiff, who was pregnant at the time, presented herself to the 69th precinct, where she was promptly arrested by defendants. Defendants handcuffed plaintiff so tightly as to cause pain and numbness and then searched her person, but did not find any contraband. Plaintiff was then kept at the precinct for a lengthy period of time before she was transported for arraignment.
Defe...
Diop, Hamath vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV00825,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, March 1, 2013, ended August 22, 2014
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On November 7, 2011, Plaintiff was in his car when three men entered, robbed Plaintiff, and forced Plaintiff to drive at knifepoint. While driving, Plaintiff’s car was struck by another vehicle, and the three men ordered Plaintiff to continue driving. Plaintiff complied. When Plaintiff saw a police vehicle nearby, he stopped the vehicle, and the three men fled on foot. Plaintiff then attempted to explain to Defendant officers Martillo and Blake that he had been robbed and been forced to drive at knifepoint, but Defendant officers ordered him to be quiet and placed him under arrest without probable cause. The New York Police Department charged Plaintiff with second degree robbery, fourth degree criminal possess...
