Kevin B. Ramirez

Kevin B. Ramirez

Kevin B. Ramirez
Badge #21323, Hispanic Male, 34
Police Officer at 44th Precinct since November 2016
Service started October 2015, made $120,000 last year, Tax #959915

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2023-29663
Closed: 2/5/2024

View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
11 Allegations
2 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Complainant Unavailable
3 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202205516, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 40-44
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #202105242, November 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202001946, February 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 31
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201900058, December 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201801512, February 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201709390, November 2017
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 27
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #201703879, May 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 23
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202205516, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Black Male, 40-44 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 40-44 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #202105242, November 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Forcible Removal to Hospital Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #202001946, February 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 31 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201900058, December 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 27 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201801512, February 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 27 Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201709390, November 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Female, 27 Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Force: Physical force Black Female, 27 Exonerated
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #201703879, May 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Hispanic Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Offensive Language: Race Hispanic Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
Discourtesy: Word Hispanic Male, 23 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2023-29663
Closed: 2/5/2024
Case Details:
  1. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 3 known lawsuits.

Sidibeh, Mahamadou vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 802011/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, January 11, 2023

Sidibeh, Mahamadou, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 803614/2022E, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 9, 2022
Complaint
Description: On June 5, 2020, Mahamadou Sidibeh, Muhammed Gumaneh and Usman Haruna (Plaintiffs) were illegally stopped, seized and searched, battered and assaulted, detained, and arrested, by Kevin Ramirez, Jose Mercedes, Jorge Flores, Scott Smith, Daniel Baca, Wilfredo Benitez, and John or Jane Does 1-10 (Defendants). Plaintiff Sidibeh was lawfully present on the sidewalk and pulled out his phone to lawfully record the conduct of the Defendants, and in response, the Defendants illegally seized and forcefully took Plaintiff Sidibeh's phone from his possession without his consent or asking for his consent. He was then illegally stopped and seized by the defendants. He was accused of a criminal offense and his arms were viole...

Rivera, Damien vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 803183/2021, Supreme Court - Bronx, March 9, 2021
Description: On December 5, 2019, while lawfully riding his pedal-operated bicycle with an electric motor to work in front of the 44th precinct building, the plaintiff was struck on his left side by a marked police vehicle turning right into the precinct parking lot without signaling. The police vehicle was not engaged in emergency operation and did not have its lights or sirens on. The defendant officer in the passenger seat apologized and inquired about injuries, while the driver demanded the plaintiff's license and falsely claimed the bicycle was illegal. The plaintiff, not required to have a driver's license for his bicycle, was unlawfully arrested and falsely accused of driving with a suspended license. Defendants Samb...

Other Documents