Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Case: 2022-25609
Closed: 12/2/2022
Case Details:
-
Failed to obtain medical treatment.
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications
Case: 2022-25610
Closed: 10/14/2022
Case Details:
-
Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: Other
Case: 2022-24934
Closed: 6/29/2022
Case Details:
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-24581
Closed: 4/26/2022
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules.
Recommendation: Other
Case: 2021-24104
Closed: 1/6/2022
Case Details:
-
Deployed a taser outside Department guidelines
-
Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
-
Failed to activate their body-worn camera.
Penalty: C - Command Discipline, vacation days (18 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Named in 2 known lawsuits, $282,500 total settlements.
Paul, Styves vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 513338/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, May 31, 2022, ended August 9, 2024
$17,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 8, 2019, Plaintiff was lawfully waiting for a taxicab near Schaefer Street and Wilson Avenue in Brooklyn when Defendant police officers unlawfully approached, pursued, stopped, and searched him, including his pockets, the waistband of his pants, and underneath his clothing. Plaintiff was then falsely arrested for allegedly interfering in an earlier arrest, an incident that never occurred. The arrest was driven by retaliation from Police Officer Karimzada, against whom Plaintiff had previously filed a misconduct complaint.
Plaintiff was handcuffed and transported to the 83rd Precinct, where he was unlawfully searched, fingerprinted, photographed, and detained for many hours. He was later taken to Kings C...
Painson, Ashley, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV02788,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, May 13, 2014, ended June 11, 2015
$265,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: Plaintiffs went outside of their residence to get some fresh air. They were told by defendant officers to disperse even if they had not committed any crimes. Defendant officers then proceeded to arrest the plaintiffs, used excessive force, and transported the plaintiffs to the 79th precinct. Defendant officers gave false statements to prosecute the plaintiffs.