Conclusion Meanings:
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $115,000 total settlements.
White, Iyona vs P.O. Brooks, Cedric et al.
Case # 15CV03865,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, July 1, 2015, ended February 19, 2016
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: Plaintiff was arrested at the 71st precinct with suspicion of a connection to an alleged robbery. Plaintiff was charged with gang assault in the second degree, multiple counts of robbery in the second degree, and eight other felony and misdemeanor charges.
Williams, Marvin vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 14CV05714,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, September 12, 2014, ended April 11, 2015
$25,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 27, 2013, NYPD plaintiff was unlawfully arrested by NYPD officers from the 40th Precinct, including Sgt. Shirley Perez Romero, Sgt. Eduardo Silva, Sgt. Christopher Douse, and P.O. Roy Rodriguez. The officers stopped plaintiff while he was lawfully driving and performed an intoxilyzer test which they then proceeded to claim was innaccurate. The officers then handcuffed plaintiff without cause, and over the next several hours, they transported him to several precincts to perform another intoxilyzer all while he remained tightly handcuffed. He was eventually taken to Bronx Central Booking for arraignment. He was falsely charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated and other offenses, and he had ...
Tarrats, Louis vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 305800/2012,
Supreme Court - Bronx, July 11, 2012, ended November 16, 2015
$90,000 Settlement