Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Case: 2022-26488
Closed: 1/3/2023
Case Details:
-
Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
Recommendation: No disciplinary action
Case: 2022-26487
Closed: 12/22/2022
Case Details:
-
Violated patrol rules.
-
Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
Penalty: A - Command Discipline, vacation days (3 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A
Case: 2022-26263
Closed: 11/17/2022
Case Details:
-
Failed to activate their body worn camera.
-
Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
-
Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other
Case: 2020-22345
Closed: 11/11/2022
Case Details:
-
Improper use of body-worn camera.
-
Wrongfully questioned person known to the Department.
Penalty: Instructions, training
Recommendation: Instructions
Case: 2020-22455
Closed: 6/29/2022
Case Details:
-
Improper frisk
-
Improper search
-
Improper stop
-
Spoke in a discourteous manner.
-
Failed to prepare a stop and frisk report.
-
Failed to prepare memo book entries.
-
Failed to provide a business card.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B
Named in 5 known lawsuits, $75,000 total settlements.
Demmerle, Ajamu vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 815552/2022E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, October 27, 2022
Complaint
Description: On July 3, 2021, defendants accused the plaintiff of the crimes of Criminal Possession of a Weapon in the 2nd and 3rd degree Criminal Possession of a Firearm and other charges. On July 3, 2021, defendants P.O. BRYAN and P.O. BRENDAN LATIMER, detained Plaintiff by detaining and processing him at the 52nd Precinct, for the purpose of falsely accusing the plaintiff of violations of the criminal laws and as a result of this arrest Plaintiff was incarcerated for (5) five months at Ricker's Island and fractured his left ankle..
Stewart, Kamar vs Weekes, Ronaldo, et al.
Case # 516577/2022,
Supreme Court - Kings, October 17, 2022
Boyd, Mark vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 811098/2022E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, July 29, 2022
Morillo, Brian vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 804081/2022E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, March 17, 2022, ended December 21, 2022
$75,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On September 12, 2021, in the Bronx, P.O.s Hanson, Scheblein, Rivera, and unknown officers Doe and Roe stopped, searched, assaulted, and detained Plaintiff Brian Morillo with no legal justification. Mr. Morillo was subject to a strip search while in NYPD custody. He was arraigned and falsely and maliciously prosecuted. He was incarcerated for over 24 hours and forced to make numerous court appearances until all charges against him were terminated favorably.
Ledesma, Hector, et Al vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 808487/2021E,
Supreme Court - Bronx, June 24, 2021