Lisa M. Boystak

Lisa M. Boystak

Lisa M. Boystak
Badge #24667, White Female
Police Officer at 105th Precinct Domestic Violence Squad since July 2026
Service started July 2011, made $147,000 last year, Tax #950097

Complaints

5 Complaints
10 Allegations
0 Substantiated
1 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
4 Exonerated
3 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202306639, June 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Black Female, 60-64
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201801584, February 2018
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show search warrant
Complainant: Black Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201505397, June 2015
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 40
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201503605, May 2015
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Female, 71
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201209326, July 2012
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Chokehold
Complainant: Black Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202306639, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Female, 60-64 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Handcuffs too tight Black Female, 60-64 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201801584, February 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search of Premises Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show search warrant Black Male, 40 Unsubstantiated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201505397, June 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 40 Alleged Victim Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201503605, May 2015
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Female, 71 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201209326, July 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 18 Exonerated
Force: Chokehold Black Male, 18 Unfounded
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Salomon, Yvelle vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 703998/2021, Supreme Court - Queens, February 24, 2021
Complaint
Description: On February 23, 2018, at or around 7:30 a.m., PLAINTIFF was lawfully in his residence. When several NYPD officers in SWAT gear, including Defendant BOYSTAK, broke down the door to the bedroom where Plaintiff was sleeping. Defendants then put a gun to PLAINTIFF’s head, and then violently threw him to the ground. Defendant BOYSTAK and the John/Jane DOE Officers unlawfully searched the area where PLAINTIFF was located. Defendants had no probable cause. Defendants placed PLAINTIFF's hands tightly behind his back and then forcefully pushed PLAINTIFF’s face into the floor. Defendant officers then stepped onto PLAINTIFF’s head and neck, kicked and punched him several times about the body, and otherwise used excessive...