Kristen A. Caldararo

Badge #30512, White Female
Police Officer at 122nd Precinct since October 2014, active
Also served at 62nd Precinct
Service started July 2005, made $143,000 last year, Tax #938148

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Abuse of Authority: Stop
Discourtesy: Word (2)

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-25323
Closed: 3/27/2023
Case: 2022-25280
Closed: 6/28/2022
Case: 2020-22791
Closed: 7/8/2021

View Details

Complaints

5 Complaints
14 Allegations
4 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Charges)
3 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Complaint Withdrawn
1 Exonerated
3 Unable to Determine
1 Unfounded
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202202282, April 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
Complainant: White Male, 65-69
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
additional details

Complaint #202002571, March 2020
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Gesture
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: White Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details

Complaint #201710433, December 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: White Female, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Female, 30
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201708721, September 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: White Male, 65
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201102088, February 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Male, 33
CCRB Conclusion: Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Complaint #202202282, April 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number White Male, 65-69 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number White Male, 65-69 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name White Male, 65-69 Unable to Determine
additional details
Complaint #202002571, March 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Interference with recording White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Charges)
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Gesture Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Force: Physical force White Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Stop White Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
APU Case Status: Pending
Penalty: APU - Decision Pending
additional details
Complaint #201710433, December 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number White Female, 30 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Female, 30 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201708721, September 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest White Male, 65 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201102088, February 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Male, 33 Complaint Withdrawn
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-25323
Closed: 3/27/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
  2. Failed to make required entries in Department logs.
  3. Failed to prepare required reports.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-25280
Closed: 6/28/2022
Case Details:
  1. Interfere with a recording device.
  2. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Wrongfully stopped an individual known to the Department
Recommendation: Charges and Specifications

Case: 2020-22791
Closed: 7/8/2021
Case Details:
  1. Pleaded Guilty: Interfere with a recording device.
  2. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully threatened to issue a summons to an individual known to the Department.
  3. Pleaded Guilty: Wrongfully discourteous to an individual.
  4. Pleaded Guilty: Failed to activate body-worn camera.
Penalty: Vacation days (20 days)


Other Documents

Employment History Summary
Employment History Summary