Louis J. Bertuccio

Former Lieutenant at Critical Response Command
Also served at Manhattan Court Section, Patrol Borough Staten Island Task Force, Transit Bureau District 34
Service started July 2002, ended October 2023, Tax #931548
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)

Complaints

2 Complaints
4 Allegations
3 Substantiated
3 Substantiated (Charges)
1 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #200814702, October 2008
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 18
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
additional details

Complaint #200409256, August 2004
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: White Male, 14
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #200814702, October 2008
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Hispanic Male, 18 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Hispanic Male, 18 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Hispanic Male, 18 Substantiated (Charges)
NYPD Conclusion: Instructions
Penalty: Instructions
additional details
Complaint #200409256, August 2004
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word White Male, 14 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.