William J. Dawson

William J. Dawson

William J. Dawson
Badge #4169, White Male
Detective Grade 3 at Warrant Section since September 2021, active
Also served at 120th Precinct
Service started January 2014, made $126,000 last year, Tax #955858

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-27499
Closed: 2/19/2024

View Details

Lawsuit settlements:
$500,000   Serini, Danielle vs City of New York, et al., 2019 EDNY EDNY 19CV00892
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Exonerated
3 Unable to Determine
3 Unfounded
2 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202205750, August 2022
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Force: Handcuffs too tight
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #202105168, August 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Command Discipline B 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline B
additional details

Complaint #202100410, January 2021
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: White Male, 55-59
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Force: Other
Complainant: White Female, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
additional details

Complaint #201907200, August 2019
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Female, 52
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #202205750, August 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Force: Handcuffs too tight Black Male, 35-39 Unfounded
Force: Physical force Black Male, 35-39 Unable to Determine
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to show arrest warrant Black Male, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #202105168, August 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline B
APU Plea Penalty: Command Discipline B 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, January 2024
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline B
additional details
Complaint #202100410, January 2021
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) White Male, 55-59 Exonerated
Force: Other White Female, 35-39 Unfounded
additional details
Complaint #201907200, August 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Female, 52 Exonerated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-27499
Closed: 2/19/2024
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful entry of a premises.
Penalty: B - Command Discipline, vacation days (5 days)
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $500,000 total settlements.

Carter, Vingal vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 22CV02440, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 15, 2022
Complaint

Serini, Danielle vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 19CV00892, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 20, 2019, ended February 21, 2023
$500,000 Settlement
Complaint