Robert J. Wagner

Lieutenant at Patrol Borough Queens South Community Response Team since December 2025
Also served at 107th Precinct, 73rd Precinct
Service started July 2007, made $211,000 last year, Tax #945088
White Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word (4)

Lawsuit Settlements:
$9,001   Cardwood, Armani vs The City of Ny, et al., 2024 EDNY EDNY 24CV02382
$50,000   Anderson, Reginald vs City of New York, et al., 2014 EDNY EDNY 13CV05731
View Details

Complaints

4 Complaints
15 Allegations
5 Substantiated
4 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
2 Exonerated
2 Unfounded
1 Unsubstantiated
5 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202401375, February 2024
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Color)
Complainant: Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 4, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
additional details

Complaint #202302927, December 2022
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201710432, December 2017
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 43
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201207010, May 2012
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 44
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202401375, February 2024
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Male Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Discourtesy: Word Male Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Race) Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Bias-Based Policing (Color) Male, 30-34 Unfounded
Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
NYPD Conclusion: APU Command Discipline A
APU Plea Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days
APU Case Status: Closed: Resolved by plea, August 4, 2026
Penalty: Forfeit vacation 5 days / Command Discipline A
additional details
Complaint #202302927, December 2022
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 30-34 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201710432, December 2017
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 43 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201207010, May 2012
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Hispanic Male, 44 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Hispanic Male, 44 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Named in 2 known lawsuits, $59,001 total settlements.

Cardwood, Armani vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 24CV02382, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, April 11, 2024, ended August 30, 2024
$9,001 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On December 30, 2022, Plaintiff, Armani Cardwood, was unlawfully pulled over around 9:00 p.m. on Hillside Avenue by Police Officer Adam A Arce, Shield 21576 and officers of the 107th Precinct for failing to have a proper rear license plate applied to the vehicle. The officers seized an incorrect claim that Mr. Cardwood was not licensed to drive, and then claimed Mr. Cardwood possessed a weapon, which was dismissed by the Queens County District Attorney's Office. As visible and audible on video one or more of the officers told Mr. Cardwood that he was being arrested because he would not shut the fuck up and was trying to be a street lawyer. After spending 24 hours incarcerated, Mr. Cardwood was charged with resi...

Anderson, Reginald vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 13CV05731, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, February 27, 2014, ended June 9, 2014
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On August 12, 2011, Police Officer Wagner, 107th Precinct, (P.O. Wagner) stopped Mr. Reginald Anderson's van and forced it to pull over without cause or justification. Mr. Anderson was unlawfully forced to remain at the scene. P.O. Wagner first claimed that he stopped Mr. Anderson for speeding. He then changed his reason and claimed Mr. Anderson failed to stop for a stop sign. He then changed his reason again and claimed he stopped Mr. Anderson for his van's allegedly tinted windows. Sergeant Milligan (Sgt. Milligan) arrived and unlawfully searched Mr. Anderson's van. There was nothing illegal or suspicious in the van. P.O. Wagner and Sgt. Milligan falsely issued Mr. Anderson a summons for transporting building...