Jaswant K. Dyal
Badge #909,
Asian Male
Also served at
Transit Bureau District 30
Service
started July 2003,
made $200,000 last year,
Tax #932588
Complaints
5
Complaints
10
Allegations
0
Substantiated
3
Complainant Uncooperative
1
Complaint Withdrawn
1
Exonerated
4
Unsubstantiated
1
Within NYPD Guidelines
Complaint #202305568,
June 2023
additional details
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complaint Withdrawn |
Complaint #202202079,
March 2022
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Male |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Within NYPD Guidelines |
Complaint #201504063,
May 2015
additional details
| Allegation: | Discourtesy: Word |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Gender |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
| Allegation: | Offensive Language: Race |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 39 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201010659,
August 2010
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Pepper spray |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Male, 16 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Exonerated |
| Allegation: | Force: Chokehold |
| Complainant: | Black Male, 16 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Unsubstantiated |
Complaint #201008161,
June 2010
additional details
| Allegation: | Force: Physical force |
|---|---|
| Complainant: | Black Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Frisk |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Allegation: | Abuse of Authority: Stop |
| Complainant: | Black Female, 20 |
| CCRB Conclusion: | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Complaint #202305568, June 2023 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Abuse of Authority: Failure to provide RTKA card | Black Male | Complaint Withdrawn |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #202202079, March 2022 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Male | Within NYPD Guidelines |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201504063, May 2015 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Discourtesy: Word | Black Female, 39 | Unsubstantiated |
| Offensive Language: Gender | Black Female, 39 | Unsubstantiated |
| Offensive Language: Race | Black Female, 39 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201010659, August 2010 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Pepper spray | Black Male, 16 | Exonerated |
| Force: Chokehold | Black Male, 16 | Unsubstantiated |
| additional details | ||
| Complaint #201008161, June 2010 | ||
| Allegation | Complainant | CCRB Conclusion |
| Force: Physical force | Black Female, 20 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Frisk | Black Female, 20 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| Abuse of Authority: Stop | Black Female, 20 | Complainant Uncooperative |
| additional details | ||
Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusion definitions.
Lawsuits
Freeman, Byanca vs City of New York et al.Case # 518918/2022, Supreme Court - Kings, September 9, 2022
Complaint
Description: On December 2, 2021, Plaintiff was lawfully present at the Church Avenue & E. 18th Street subway station in Brooklyn. Defendants, including PO Randy Duran, PO Jedsen Ramos, and PO Jaswant Dyal, unlawfully approached and stopped Plaintiff. After a questioning her and demanding ID, Defendants became impatient, falsely accused Plaintiff of a criminal offense, and unlawfully seized Plaintiff. In the process, they violently grabbed her body, forcefully slammed facedown onto the ground, and kept her pressed down using their legs and knees. Plaintiff was unable to breath because of this unlawful contact. Defendants forcefully contorted Plaintiff's arms behind her back to handcuff her. The handcuffs were too tight, cau...