Complaint #201500176, January 2015

Incident: January 9, 2015
Received: January 11, 2015
Closed: May 27, 2015

Reason for contact: Assist ACS or other agency
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 113th Precinct Queens
Outcome: Arrest - resisting arrest

Witness Officers: Abdulhadi Chalati, Matthew Demaio, David Goldstein

Officer:	Palemire, Thomas
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Palemire, Thomas
Complainant:	Black Female, 25
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Palemire, Thomas
Complainant:	Black Female, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Moore, Timothy
Complainant:	Black Female, 25
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Moore, Timothy
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Moore, Timothy
Complainant:	Black Female, 25
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female, 25-29
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Palemire, Thomas		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Palemire, Thomas	Black Female, 25	Offensive Language: Gender	Unsubstantiated
Palemire, Thomas	Black Female, 25	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Moore, Timothy	Black Female, 25	Offensive Language: Gender	Unsubstantiated
Moore, Timothy		Abuse of Authority: Premises entered and/or searched	Exonerated
Moore, Timothy	Black Female, 25	Force: Physical force	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Female, 25-29	Offensive Language: Gender	Officer(s) Unidentified

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.