Complaint #201702803, April 2017

Incident: April 11, 2017
Closed: January 16, 2018


Document: Complaint Closing Report

Reason for contact: Report-dispute
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 28th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued

Witness Officers: Emre Guven, Jeffrey Hunold
Officer: Lechmanski, Lawrence
Complainant: White Male, 63
Allegation: Offensive Language: Other
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Colvert, Sairis
Complainant: White Male, 63
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Ungcharoen, Suthom
Complainant: White Male, 63
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Officer: Slamowitz, Austin
Complainant: White Male, 63
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Officer: Lechmanski, Lawrence
Complainant: White Male, 63
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Lechmanski, Lawrence White Male, 63 Offensive Language: Other Unsubstantiated
Colvert, Sairis White Male, 63 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated
Ungcharoen, Suthom White Male, 63 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Slamowitz, Austin White Male, 63 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Substantiated (Command Lvl Instructions)
Lechmanski, Lawrence White Male, 63 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Unsubstantiated

Penalties

Ungcharoen, Suthom
Instructions

Slamowitz, Austin
Instructions


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.