Complaint #202107668, December 2021

Incident: December 10, 2021
Received: December 17, 2021
Closed: April 5, 2023


Reason for contact: Moving violation
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 32nd Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
Officer: Travis, Daniel
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Officer: Ruizreyes, Charlie
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Property damaged
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Nohilly, Ryan
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
Allegation: Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Travis, Daniel
Complainant: Black Female, 25-29
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Travis, Daniel Black Female, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Vehicle search Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Ruizreyes, Charlie Black Female, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Property damaged Unable to Determine
Nohilly, Ryan Black Male, 30-34 Force: Physical force Unfounded
Travis, Daniel Black Female, 25-29 Abuse of Authority: Seizure of property Within NYPD Guidelines

Penalty

Travis, Daniel
No Disciplinary Action-DUP
No penalty


Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.