Oscar Mancilla

Oscar Mancilla

Oscar Mancilla
Badge #456, Hispanic Male
Police Officer at 75th Precinct Domestic Violence Squad since July 2026
Also served at 75th Precinct
Service started October 2015, made $141,000 last year, Tax #959782

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Discourtesy: Word

Discipline Cases:

Case: 2022-26376
Closed: 2/27/2023
Case: 2022-25506
Closed: 1/16/2023
Case: 2021-24044
Closed: 1/19/2022

View Details

Lawsuit Settlements:
$54,001   Nixon, Shameik vs City of Ny, 2022 EDNY EDNY 21CV05900
$50,000   Barrett, Shaquille, et Al vs City of Ny, et al., 2021 KCSC KCSC 519887/2020
$15,000   Parsons, Keisha vs City of New York, et al., 2019 KCSC KCSC 508756/2019
View Details

Complaints

7 Complaints
14 Allegations
3 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
1 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
2 Complainant Uncooperative
3 Exonerated
5 Unsubstantiated
1 Within NYPD Guidelines

Complaint #202306803, July 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 45-49
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details

Complaint #202304805, June 2023
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details

Complaint #202003958, June 2020
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 30-34
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #202002745, April 2020
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Search (of person)
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 25-29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 35-39
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details

Complaint #201908017, September 2019
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop
Complainant: Black Male, 21-24
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details

Complaint #201809492, November 2018
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Female, 56
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201605587, June 2016
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 49
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #202306803, July 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide shield number Black Male, 45-49 Substantiated (Formalized Training)
Penalty: Formalized Training
additional details
Complaint #202304805, June 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 30-34 Within NYPD Guidelines
additional details
Complaint #202003958, June 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 30-34 Exonerated
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #202002745, April 2020
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Black Male, 35-39 Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
Discourtesy: Word Black Male, 35-39 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Search (of person) Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 25-29 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 35-39 Unsubstantiated
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
additional details
Complaint #201908017, September 2019
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Vehicle stop Black Male, 21-24 Unsubstantiated
Discourtesy: Word Exonerated
Discourtesy: Word Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP
Penalty: No penalty
Documents: Complaint Closing Report
additional details
Complaint #201809492, November 2018
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Female, 56 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201605587, June 2016
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 49 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusions.


Discipline

Case: 2022-26376
Closed: 2/27/2023
Case Details:
  1. Failed to activate their body worn camera.
Recommendation: Other

Case: 2022-25506
Closed: 1/16/2023
Case Details:
  1. Wrongful threat of force.
Recommendation: Command Discipline - B

Case: 2021-24044
Closed: 1/19/2022
Case Details:
  1. Wrongfully discourteous to an individual known to the Department
Recommendation: Command Discipline - A


Lawsuits

Named in 5 known lawsuits, $119,001 total settlements.

Reyes, Seanpaul & Scalzo, James vs The City of Ny, et al.
Case # 522947/2024, Supreme Court - Kings, August 29, 2024
Complaint
Description: On June 1, 2023 Plaintiff Reyes visited the 75th Precinct to file a complaint while his friend Plaintiff Scalzo remained outside. Plaintiff Reyes was filming to document the process. After entering the lobby Plaintiff encountered a PO who repeatedly told Plaintiff he could not film in the precinct. The PO then spoke to POs Johnathan Ortega, Franklyn Guaman, Oscar Mancilla, or Nicholas Sommella, who shortly confronted and physically grabbed Plaintiff to push him out of the precinct. On the public sidewalk PO Ortega and PO Mancill pushed and shoved Plaintiff about the torso. Plaintiff Reyes then re-entered and was promptly handcuffed. POs also confiscated Plaintiff's camera, microphone, and other property. Plaint...

Nixon, Shameik vs City of Ny
Case # 21CV05900, U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, October 20, 2022, ended April 27, 2023
$54,001 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On June 5, 2020, the plaintiff was at a memorial service when NYPD Officers ordered plaintiff to go home in accordance to the emergency curfew. Plaintiff was complying with the order, but NYPD officers who were carrying batons and wearing riot gear attacked him while he was walking home. They hit him with a barricade and piled on top of him, including forcefully placing knees on his back. The officers handcuffed him too tightly, put him in the police van and continued to lift his arms causing him pain, and brought him to the precinct, falsely arresting him. Officers unnecessarily removed his socks and shoes and left him handcuffed in a cell for several hours before removing the cuffs. Plaintiff was detained for...

Barrett, Shaquille, et Al vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 519887/2020, Supreme Court - Kings, January 12, 2021, ended January 31, 2025
$50,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On May 11, 2018, Plaintiff Shaquille Barrett and Dyamond Jones were outside when Defendant Police Officers unlawfully stopped and searched them, along with an entire block full of young black people. Plaintiffs Barrett and Jones were arrested for possession of a knife, although they were not in possession of an illegal knife. Plaintiff Barrett was assaulted by Defendant Police Officers. One of Defendant Police Officers pushed Mr. Barrett against a gate and scraped his left side, causing a cut and him to bleed. At arraignment Plaintiffs received an Adjournment in Contemplation of Dismissal (“ACD”). Plaintiff Barrett was incarcerated for approximately 31 hours while Plaintiff Jones was incarcerated for approximat...

Perez, Miguel, et al. vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 520206/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, September 17, 2019
Complaint
Description: On November 3, 2018, plaintiffs Jeanette Rodriguez and Miguel Perez were lawfully present inside an apartment unit. Defendant-NYPD officers, including Oscar Mancilla (Shield No. 456), entered the unit. The defendant-officers proceeded to assault and batter the plaintiffs without probable cause in the course of conducting unlawful arrests. Subsequently, defendant-officers falsely arrested and confined the plaintiffs without probable cause and without arrest warrants. The defendant-officers then created and submitted erroneous police reports in order to justify their actions against the plaintiffs. These actions resulted in plaintiffs incurring reputational and physical, and plaintiff Perez's incursion of economi...

Parsons, Keisha vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 508756/2019, Supreme Court - Kings, May 1, 2019, ended February 3, 2020
$15,000 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 29, 2018 Keisha Parsons ("Plaintiff") was unlawfully arrested using excessive physical force, and threats, then detained and charged, with crimes the Plaintiff did not commit, by Officer Mancillo and John Does 1-9 ("Defendants") The DA refused to prosecute and the Defendants acted intentionally. willfully. knowingly, negligently, and with reckless disregard for, and deliberate indifference to the rights of the Plaintiff. The City of NY ("Defendant 2") properly hire, train, supervise, monitor and discipline its officers and this occurred as a direct result of policies, practices and customs developed, implemented, enforced, encouraged, sanctioned or tolerated by Defendant 2.

Other Documents

Brooklyn DA Disclosure Letter references additional CCRB complaints #201904933, #202000571, #202000865