Raphael E. Mero

Lieutenant at 102nd Precinct Detective Squad since September 2024
Service started July 2008, made $201,000 last year, Tax #947247
Hispanic Male

Substantiated Allegations:
Abuse of Authority: Stop

Complaints

7 Complaints
11 Allegations
1 Substantiated
1 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
1 Closed - Pending Litigation
2 Complainant Unavailable
1 Complainant Uncooperative
2 Exonerated
4 Unsubstantiated

Complaint #202308409, September 2023
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 18-20
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details

Complaint #202101443, February 2021
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
CCRB Conclusion: Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details

Complaint #201400077, December 2013
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Black Male, 37
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
additional details

Complaint #201104278, April 2011
Allegation: Force: Physical force
Complainant: Hispanic Male, 29
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #201014318, October 2010
Allegation: Force: Gun Pointed
Complainant: Male, 21
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Uncooperative
additional details

Complaint #201006355, May 2010
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Male
CCRB Conclusion: Complainant Unavailable
additional details

Complaint #201002178, February 2010
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Frisk
Complainant: Black Male, 61
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Stop
Complainant: Black Male, 61
CCRB Conclusion: Exonerated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
Complainant: Black Male, 61
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest
Complainant: Black Male, 61
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
additional details

Complaint #202308409, September 2023
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 18-20 Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
Penalty: Command Discipline - A
additional details
Complaint #202101443, February 2021
Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Closed - Pending Litigation
additional details
Complaint #201400077, December 2013
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Black Male, 37 Exonerated
additional details
Complaint #201104278, April 2011
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Physical force Hispanic Male, 29 Unsubstantiated
additional details
Complaint #201014318, October 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Force: Gun Pointed Male, 21 Complainant Uncooperative
additional details
Complaint #201006355, May 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Discourtesy: Word Male Complainant Unavailable
Abuse of Authority: Stop Male Complainant Unavailable
additional details
Complaint #201002178, February 2010
Allegation Complainant CCRB Conclusion
Abuse of Authority: Frisk Black Male, 61 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Stop Black Male, 61 Exonerated
Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Black Male, 61 Unsubstantiated
Abuse of Authority: Threat of arrest Black Male, 61 Unsubstantiated
additional details

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusions.


Lawsuits

Roland, Gerald vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 20CV05392, U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, August 10, 2020, ended June 3, 2024
Zero Disposition
Complaint
Description: On January 29, 2016, the Plaintiff was walking on the sidewalk, not committing crimes or violating laws, when he was approached by Defendants Rios and Mero in a threatening manner. The Defendants proceeded to unlawfully stop and search the Plaintiff by rifling through his clothes and pockets. They contorted the Plaintiff's arms behind his back in a violent manner and put on excessively tight handcuffs. The Plaintiff voiced his pain and asked the Defendants to loosen the handcuffs, but the Defendants ignored his cries. The Defendants brought the Plaintiff to central booking and intentionally conveyed false/fabricated information to the DAO. They alleged that the Plaintiff was working with another individual that...