Complaint from November 21, 2015

Incident: November 21, 2015
Received: November 23, 2015
Closed: January 18, 2017
Witness Officers: Elvis Duran, Miguel Frias, Pawel Lachowski, Giovanni Laguna, Manolin Molina, Sincerae Tinsley, Jason Zupka

Reason for contact: PD suspected C/V of violation/crime - street
Location: Street/highway
Outcome: Arrest - other violation/crime
In 40th Precinct Bronx

Officer: Benintendo, Jonathan White Male
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Diaz, Ervy Hispanic Male, 39
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Officer: Diaz, Ervy Hispanic Male, 39
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Zorrilla, John Hispanic Male, 35
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Offensive Language: Race
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Zorrilla, John Hispanic Male, 35
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Officer: Zorrilla, John Hispanic Male, 35
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP, penalty: Command Discipline - B
Officer: Zorrilla, John Hispanic Male, 35
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Unsubstantiated
Officer: Zorrilla, John Hispanic Male, 35
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Zorrilla, John Hispanic Male, 35
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Officer: Zorrilla, John Hispanic Male, 35
Complainant: Black Male, 34
Allegation: Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion: Alleged Victim Unavailable
Officer: Zuber, Neil White Male, 39
Complainant: Black Male, 36
Allegation: Abuse Of Authority: Retaliatory arrest
CCRB Conclusion: Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP, penalty: No penalty

Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Benintendo, Jonathan
White Male
Black Male, 36 Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Unsubstantiated
Diaz, Ervy
Hispanic Male, 39
Black Male, 34 Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - A
Diaz, Ervy
Hispanic Male, 39
Black Male, 34 Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Zorrilla, John
Hispanic Male, 35
Black Male, 36 Offensive Language: Race Unsubstantiated
Zorrilla, John
Hispanic Male, 35
Black Male, 36 Abuse Of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: Command Discipline - B
Zorrilla, John
Hispanic Male, 35
Black Male, 36 Force: Pepper spray Substantiated (Command Discipline B)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP, penalty: Command Discipline - B
Zorrilla, John
Hispanic Male, 35
Black Male, 36 Discourtesy: Word Unsubstantiated
Zorrilla, John
Hispanic Male, 35
Black Male, 34 Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to provide name/shield number Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Zorrilla, John
Hispanic Male, 35
Black Male, 34 Abuse Of Authority: Refusal to process civilian complaint Alleged Victim Uncooperative
Zorrilla, John
Hispanic Male, 35
Black Male, 34 Discourtesy: Word Alleged Victim Unavailable
Zuber, Neil
White Male, 39
Black Male, 36 Abuse Of Authority: Retaliatory arrest Substantiated (Command Discipline A)
NYPD Conclusion: No Disciplinary Action-DUP, penalty: No penalty

Conclusion Meanings:

'Substantiated': The alleged conduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unsubstantiated': The CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.