Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $36,499 total settlements.
Samu, Cheyenne vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 25CV01351,
U.S. District Court - Southern District NY, February 25, 2025, ended March 10, 2026
$24,999 Settlement
Brown, Rashaan, et al. vs City of Ny, et al.
Case # 532746/2024,
Supreme Court - Kings, January 13, 2025
Santos, Celia vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 159922/2013,
Supreme Court - New York, November 12, 2013, ended October 8, 2014
$11,500 Settlement
Complaint
Description: On April 16, 2013, Plaintiff was sleeping with her daughter in the living room of her family's apartment, which she was sharing, at 250 Clinton St, Apt. 4H, NY, NY. Police executed a "no knock" search warrant and entered the apartment. The police were searching for "Angel", Plaintiff's cousin. "Angel" was inside his bedroom, not shared with Plaintiff. Police seized a firearm from "Angel", from inside his mattress. Defendants arrested Plaintiff. Plaintiff was in custody for more than 15 hours before she was released. No criminal charges were ever filed against the Plaintiff.