Conclusion Meanings:
'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
'Substantiated': The misconduct occurred and it violated the rules. The NYPD has discretion over what, if any, discipline is imposed.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - The alleged conduct was investigated but could not determine both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.
Further details on conclusions.
Named in 3 known lawsuits, $230,000 total settlements.
Garafalo, Therese vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 20CV05903,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, December 22, 2020, ended March 29, 2022
$80,000 Settlement
Complaint
Cole, Carlos vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 709117/2017,
Supreme Court - Queens, January 30, 2017, ended July 14, 2020
$150,000 Settlement
Yusuf, Issiah & Yarbrough, Lasandra vs City of New York, et al.
Case # 15CV05545,
U.S. District Court - Eastern District NY, September 24, 2015
Complaint
Description: 1st Incident: Plaintiff was falsely arrested for trespassing, taken to the 100th PCT, and then released without charges after the DA declined to prosecute.2nd incident: Officers warrantlessly entered Plaintiff's apartment, handcuffed everyone, including teenagers, searched it, then unhandcuffed everyone and left. 3rd incident: Plaintiff was approached while walking the street and given a summons for a city park regulation, which was later dismissed. 4th/5th incident: Officers Byrd and Mitchell taunted Plaintiff about his weight and gave him a bogus summons. 6th incident: Plaintiff was falsely arrested for a robbery and assault, the charges were later dismissed.