Complaint #200802096, February 2008

Incident: February 2, 2008
Received: February 8, 2008
Closed: October 1, 2009

Reason for contact: C/V intervened on behalf of/observed encounter w/3rd party
Location: Street/highway
In NYPD 46th Precinct Bronx
Outcome: Arrest - assault (against a PO)

Witness Officers: Jerry Choi, Rafael Colon, John Flanagan, Jeffrey Griffin, Juan Jimenez, Nazim Karim, Ronald Kowalski, Vladimir Krull, Steven Lopez, Indiana Mcgowananderson, Louis Ortiz, Rafael Perdomo

Officer:	Okeeffe, Brian
Complainant:	Black Female, 31
Allegation:	Force: Physical force
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Okeeffe, Brian
Complainant:	Black Female, 31
Allegation:	Force: Pepper spray
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated
Officer:	Okeeffe, Brian
Allegation:	Offensive Language: Gender
CCRB Conclusion:	Unfounded
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Female, 30-34
Allegation:	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched
CCRB Conclusion:	Officer(s) Unidentified
Officer:	Okeeffe, Brian
Complainant:	Black Female, 31
Allegation:	Discourtesy: Word
CCRB Conclusion:	Unsubstantiated
Officer:	Unknown Officer
Complainant:	Black Male, 35-39
Allegation:	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)
CCRB Conclusion:	Exonerated

Officer	Complainant	Allegation	CCRB Conclusion
Okeeffe, Brian	Black Female, 31	Force: Physical force	Exonerated
Okeeffe, Brian	Black Female, 31	Force: Pepper spray	Exonerated
Okeeffe, Brian		Offensive Language: Gender	Unfounded
Unknown Officer	Black Female, 30-34	Abuse of Authority: Strip-searched	Officer(s) Unidentified
Okeeffe, Brian	Black Female, 31	Discourtesy: Word	Unsubstantiated
Unknown Officer	Black Male, 35-39	Force: Nightstick as club (incl asp & baton)	Exonerated

Conclusion Meanings:

'Exonerated': or 'Within NYPD Guidelines' - the alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.

'Unsubstantiated': or 'Unable to Determine' - CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.

Further details on conclusion definitions.