Complaint #202300582, January 2023

Incident: January 7, 2023
Received: January 22, 2023
Closed: March 19, 2024


Reason for contact: Report-domestic dispute
Location: Apartment/house
In NYPD 34th Precinct Manhattan
Outcome: No arrest made or summons issued
Officer: Powell, Dwight
Complainant: Black, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical)
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Lamey, Jamar
Complainant: Age 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer: Lamey, Jamar
Complainant: Age 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises
CCRB Conclusion: Within NYPD Guidelines
Officer: Lamey, Jamar
Complainant: Age 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera
CCRB Conclusion: Unable to Determine
Officer: Lamey, Jamar
Complainant: Black, 21-24
Allegation: Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name
CCRB Conclusion: Unfounded
Officer Complainant Allegation CCRB Conclusion
Powell, Dwight Black, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Threat of force (verbal or physical) Unfounded
Lamey, Jamar Age 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Obstructed Shield Number Unfounded
Lamey, Jamar Age 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Entry of Premises Within NYPD Guidelines
Lamey, Jamar Age 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Improper use of body-worn camera Unable to Determine
Lamey, Jamar Black, 21-24 Abuse of Authority: Refusal to provide name Unfounded

Conclusion Meanings:

'Unable to Determine': CCRB has fully investigated but could not affirmatively conclude both that the conduct occurred and that it broke the rules.
'Unfounded': Evidence suggests that the event or alleged conduct did not occur.
'Within NYPD Guidelines': The alleged conduct occurred but did not violate the NYPD's own rules, which often give officers significant discretion.

Further details on conclusion definitions.